Now, speaking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a class of timepieces that is normally employed for even ten per cent of its potential.
What's it to possess the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", when the person has fastened his wrist into the max after a dip along with a couple of strokes, return instantly to lounge under the umbrella?
If that is their principal use it's only the fault of old habits at least as much as the debut of the so-called divers of the contemporary age that dates back into the middle of the previous century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain devised the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces that the group can boast, was tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of the well-identified abysses at "The Silent World", a famed documentary -film additionally winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I believe that non-fans will remember well one of the first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the film Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist thanks to his fabric strap turned into a legend. It was a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to know each other with no crown protector shoulders, imitated a bit by everybody.
These are just a couple of the very first cases that show - fiction or fact - for over fifty years, the press - driven by the watch industry - determined the diver watches should be the very first to personify the idea of man-adventure. Perhaps it's also from that day the manufacturers when it came to describing their models started to use the phrase: "suitable for any event".
The 007 change, unfortunately also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanics of the most famous spy on earth, and obviously also the watch whose function has been played by the Omega Seamaster for several years.
But beyond their actual use within this massive family whose origins would only deal with "hard check here even more than steel", now there are also models so bejeweled to fear even once you need to wash the hands.
However, a real diver's view has generally always had a whole lot to say technically talking. Let's just mention the characteristics and constructive characteristics of these fascinating references.
I've a long standing friend who is an expert diver and that, during his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100 percent of his diving watch - including that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures which are breathed at large depths.
A real wrist sub must be able to ensure these performances:
Excellent visibility during the dip
A protection against magnetic fields superior to the norm
Resistance to salt and impact water
Accurate verification of the operation of the system that reports that the dive time
An in-depth test of the efficiency of its motion, either quartz or mechanical
But the tests did not end here: now professional diving watches need to adhere to specific rules such as the ones described by ISO 6425.
To get a common mortal use, what we know is the best, the best sub could be in the end a watchable to provide attributes much milder and easier to manage.
I recall this in order to simply immerse the surface in maximum safety, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 ATM (about 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but this is not so when it is done a banal swim at the sea. It'd be better to avoid diving, especially if ours couldn't even rely to a screw-on crown, better still if secure on the sides from the classic two shoulders.
And the safety on the waterproof status of this submerged timepieces?
Precisely for those who'd use them for specialist purposes the ideal would be to be able to rely upon a system that visually signals about the dial in case the crown is not completely screwed, as well as the watch is consequently at a blatant state of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the principal reason why even an abyssal super dive watch may need to be hurried into a service center, before seawater entering it risks virtually any mechanism indefinitely. This function already exists, but on very few versions, which honestly I don't understand why.
You may have worn your diving diver's watch on your wrist to go to the sea and as a result, after adjusting the moment, have left to twist the crown snugly. It is the most frequent case.
Suggestion - When you've worn the costume decide on the fly : either leave your diver someplace safe or obligatorily create a final but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we've seen a little 'of problems related to the time that must satisfy with the water, and also given the essential advice, I show you which - so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I have divided them into two categories. The order in which they appear doesn't signify any position.